How To Spot FAKE Air Jordan 1 High OG UNC Toe in 2023

Box Label

As we always do, we start off with the box to inspect the real vs fake comparison of the Jordan 1 High OG UNC Toe.

Within the realm of unauthorized (UA) manufacturing, there exists a remarkable advancement in replicating even the minutiae of box labels. A prime illustration unfolds here in the scrutiny of this box label, where meticulous observation reveals a near-perfect emulation. However, a nuanced discrepancy emerges in the font-weight—a subtle yet discernible variance. The authentic box label boasts a slender font, a feature subtly deviated from in the counterfeit rendition, where the printed characters exhibit a bolder demeanor. To facilitate your comparison, I've highlighted these distinctions within the confines of yellow and red boxes for your scrutiny.

Rear

Transitioning to the posterior facet for a meticulous examination of the revered hourglass contour. The unauthorized or UA iteration appears to exhibit a penchant for excess, evident in the overly precise curvature, causing a conspicuous bulging effect that transforms the heel contour into a more rounded shape. In stark contrast, the genuine counterpart maintains the iconic hourglass silhouette, preserving its authenticity and remaining unmistakably true to its original form.

Note: The colors are not a good legit checking, however for this comparison, it's pretty obvious that the replica is darker, while the real pair is lighter in hue.

Back Insoles

The rear insole proves to be an unreliable litmus test for legitimacy in this release, primarily because the counterfeit replicas have meticulously imitated nearly every aspect of the authentic insoles. Notably, the duplicated insoles diverge in their tactile quality, featuring a discernibly matte finish, whereas the legitimate retail counterparts boast a distinct glossy sheen. Lastly, the texture for the fake pair is rougher, while the authentic insoles are smoother.

Footbed

Directing our scrutiny towards the footbed, an area where the stitching pattern of this particular replica reveals its shortcomings. A conspicuous disparity emerges when comparing the authentic pair, characterized by a more tightly compacted stitch gap spacing, with the counterfeit counterpart displaying erratic stitching, deemed notably inconsistent in its arrangement.

Wing Logo

Proceeding to inspect the wing logo on both pairs, our attention is drawn to two key aspects. Firstly, highlighted within squares, a notable contrast in font thickness becomes evident—where the genuine pair exhibits a bolder font, the replicated counterpart features a thinner rendition. Secondly, emphasized within circles, a distinction in the leather grain surfaces. The authentic pair boasts a tumbled effect, lending a textured quality, while the imitation settles for a plain and uniform leather grain. Additionally, it's worth noting that the embossed finish on the wings diverges in intensity; the retail pairs showcase a more pronounced debossed effect, whereas the replicas present a less prominent and subdued embossing.

Extra Laces

Turning our scrutiny towards the supplementary laces, a meticulous examination reveals a noteworthy discrepancy. Illustrated with arrows, the spacing between the red and yellow dots in relation to the perforated rectangle diverges noticeably. The authentic box positions these elements in closer proximity to the perforation, whereas the counterfeit variant features a more pronounced gap. Further, directing attention to the word "shoelaces," a distinction in font characteristics becomes apparent. The replica employs a thinner and less prominent font, while the retail counterpart's lacing nomenclature is endowed with a bolder and more pronounced appearance.

Tongue Label

Turning our investigative lens to the tongue label, a conspicuous detail beckons our scrutiny. Notably, the embroidery on the UA pairs manifests in darker hues, diverging from the lighter shades adorning the authentic counterparts. Additionally, a closer inspection, facilitated by zooming in, unravels another layer of distinction. The fonts on the fake tongue label deviate noticeably, with the letter "A" featuring larger perforation holes, a departure from the smaller and more refined diameter observed in the authentic pair's tongue label.

Size Label

Shifting our focus to the size label, a discernible dissimilarity emerges in the typography of both pairs. The genuine size tag boasts a font that is not only bolder but also exhibits a higher quality and consistency in its prints. In contrast, the counterfeit size label features thinner fonts, accompanied by prints that betray an inconsistency. This discrepancy becomes particularly noteworthy as it contributes to the susceptibility of fake size labels to premature rubbing off, distinguishing them from their more resilient and finely crafted authentic counterparts.

Note: Not all replicas are the same and we limit our comparison based on the data posted.

To ensure the utmost accuracy and convenience, we encourage you to download our App, available on both IOS and Playstore platforms. Our App is specifically designed to assist you in verifying the authenticity of your sneakers, providing you with a reliable and efficient tool for your peace of mind.