How To Spot FAKE Air Jordan 4 Travis Scott University Blue in 2023

Box Label

Inspecting the shoe box labels meticulously, a stark distinction emerges between the authentic and the replica. At first glance, the typography offers a clue. The genuine label sports a refined, slender typeface, gracefully presenting its information. In contrast, the replica label employs a much bolder, almost audacious font, missing the subtlety of its original counterpart.

To further elucidate the discrepancy in alignment, I've illustrated it with a guiding line. This line reveals that the replica's descriptive text stretches out far more than it should, daringly encroaching upon the space of the iconic Jump Man logo. This oversight, however minor it might seem to the untrained eye, is a telltale sign of its inauthenticity.

Rear

Highlighted within a sunlit yellow box, I direct your attention to the authentic rendition of the Cactus Jack font. This distinct lettering stands as the benchmark of authenticity. But when juxtaposed against the unauthorized pair, the disparity is clear – the imitative font is noticeably slender, lacking the robustness of the genuine article.

Furthermore, an examination of the splatters unveils yet another divergence. While there exists a natural variance in the placement and magnitude of these splatters between pairs, the counterfeit displays its own telltale signs. The splatters on the fake pair seem crowded, packed closely together, almost suffocating in their proximity. Conversely, the genuine pair showcases splatters that breathe freely, are scattered with intention, and are distinctly carved in their silhouette.

Tongue Label

When the tongue labels are laid side by side, subtle nuances become unmistakably evident. Using arrows as precise guides, your attention is drawn to the suede cut-out endings. The genuine pair boasts a rich hue, dancing vividly with life, while its counterfeit counterpart is washed out, presenting a subdued, almost melancholic shade of blue.

Moreover, the iconic Jump Man doesn’t escape the forgers' oversight. On the fake pair, he appears somewhat distorted, lacking the crisp definition one would expect. This misrepresentation is most evident in the arms – which, instead of displaying a poised and balanced posture, seem awkward and askew, paling in comparison to the impeccable form of the authentic figure.

Back Insoles

The back insoles serve as an insightful reference point when determining the authenticity of these pairs. While the imitation comes alarmingly close to the genuine article, discerning eyes will still catch the distinctions. Observe, for instance, the glue line residue on the real pair; it is prominent, revealing an unmistakable mark of originality. Conversely, the adhesive trails on the fake pair appear frail and somewhat fleeting. It's evident that, while the unauthorized manufacturers made concerted efforts to mirror the real deal, they overlooked or perhaps underestimated this detail. The same lapse in meticulousness extends to the footbed material, presenting another subtle but significant deviation from the genuine pair.

Size Label

In scrutinizing the size label, two primary discrepancies stand out. First and foremost, the placement of the 'US size 8.5' on the authentic pair skews slightly off-center, lending it a unique alignment. In contrast, the replica seems to strive for perfection, placing the '8.5' directly in the center – a move away from the original's characteristic positioning.

Further deepening the gap between genuine and imitation is the UPC code. The fake pair bears a code that is glaringly erroneous. This misstep, clear and unambiguous, serves as an undeniable red flag during the authentication process.

Side Panel

When juxtaposed, the primary distinction that immediately catches one's gaze is the variation in color tones. The genuine pair exudes a deep and rich hue, standing in stark contrast to its imitation counterpart which appears pallid, missing the oilers vibe and depth of the authentic pair.

Additionally, your eye may drift to the stitching intricacies on the wing brackets. The genuine pair exhibits tight, compact stitches, meticulously sewn with precision. In stark contrast, the stitches on the replica are broader and more spaced out, betraying its inauthenticity.

Rounding off the distinctions is the sock liner. The lining in the replica is immersed in a shade that's notably deeper than its genuine counterpart, further underscoring the differences between the two.

Insole Print

Upon examining the insole prints, the splatters immediately draw attention to the replica's attempt at mimicking the genuine insole. Yet, the differences are undeniable. When focusing on the 'Cactus' font, the genuine pair presents with crisp and sharp prints, each letter etched with precision. In contrast, the replica’s rendition is haphazard – the font appears muddled and lacks the clarity characteristic of the authentic print.

Further differentiating the two is the shade of the print. The genuine pair boasts a more pronounced shade, while the replica, ironically, overshadows its intent by presenting a shade that's too intense, darkening beyond the genuine's hue.

Hang Tag

Adding the hang tags for your reference, The main thing to point out here is the font for the replica is just too thick when compared with the real pair. The chains for both pairs are also different as you can see, retail pair chains are colored black while the fake pair chain is in a silverish tone color.

The suede color is very distinguishable, notice the fake pair color being too pale, unlike the authentic hang tag with a much darker hue.

Inside Label

Upon closely inspecting the inside label at the back of the tongue, adorned with the AIR JORDAN patch, the discrepancies between genuine and imitation come to light. The embroidery of the fake label immediately stands out - its threads form letters that are not only taller but also exhibit a jagged texture. Conversely, the genuine pair displays an embroidery that is artfully precise: the letters are diminutive, neatly packed together in a compact pattern.

Highlighting another key difference is a red arrow that points to a telling oversight on the replica: a stray thread conjoins the letters D & A, a mishap that is conspicuously absent from the meticulous craftsmanship of the authentic pair.

Note: Not all replicas are the same and we limit our comparison based on the data posted.

To ensure the utmost accuracy and convenience, we encourage you to download our App, available on both IOS and Playstore platforms. Our App is specifically designed to assist you in verifying the authenticity of your sneakers, providing you with a reliable and efficient tool for your peace of mind.